Why my 7900xtx is 2x slower with Vulkan compared ot ROCm?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just ran some llama-bench comparisons between ROCm and Vulkan backends on my Strix Halo system. Vulkan came out ahead, which surprised me.</p>

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1ww49o9/amd_ryzen_ai_developer_platform_os_updated_with/"> <img alt="AMD Ryzen AI Developer Platform OS

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So i recently updated LMstudio after a long pause and updated my llama.cpp runtimes too.. i was shocked.. i thought maybe something like

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am currently running dual RTX 5060 ti 16gb (both of which are easy to sell or re-use in other PCs at home) and monitoring the used market for

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey folks</p> <p>I'm starting to hear that ROCm works fine for inference now. But, I've not seen any reports on how viable it is for training. I

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know Ubuntu racoon has been released several days ago. I wonder if new mesa / vulkan / nouveau drivers made inference on NVIDIA any faster?</p>