Why are people calling Chat-GPT 6 Astra "AGI" ?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been using Astra Max since it was released. Over the last 24-48 hours responses have typically been taking twice as long to generate. The

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If Astra is considered as an AGI then AGI is sh\*t</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1wyrvoc/gpt61_astra_delay/"> <img alt="GPT-6.1 Astra Delay"

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1ww0lpo/built_this_game_with_astra_6/"> <img alt="Built this game with Astra 6"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My dot is reviewing PRs (unprompted) by reading my gmail and responding in our chat session since it doesn’t have Github access. (Public

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have been using ChatGPT almost exclusively for the last years. Only with the recent downgrades in usage and price increases have I started

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm seeing some people desperately claiming what we have now is agi. If AI cannot do RSI or self improve without human supervision and

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/RustyCaffeine"> /u/RustyCaffeine </a> <br /> <span><a