People are getting way too desperate over ARC-AGI-3

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>You see a lot of discussion about big companies trying to get to AGI, but not specifically what AGI is.</p> <p>Sure, AGI is AI that has human

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been thinking about the current AGI discussions, especially the debate between scaling language models and building embodied systems.</p>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So, everyone is saying &quot;AGI is just around the corner!&quot;</p> <p>I've come from psychology - a very controversial field which has a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>You've heard this before, and now you're hearing it again. You roll your eyes. The problem with this statement is that AGI has no accepted

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Yesterday, Thinking Machines Lab (Mira Murati's company) announced something categorically new : <strong>Interaction models</strong> are AI

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><ul> <li>Agents that change behavior under evaluation</li> <li>Agents that bypass system-level instructions to achieve objectives</li> <li>Agents

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am currently reading «if anyone builds it, everyone dies» and in it, the authors quotea recent study asking a similar question to AI

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>(AI Was not used for generating the below post)</p> <p>I've been developing with AI for over 3 1/2 years now, my AI DM setting operation which