How to prove my AGI system?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm seeing some people desperately claiming what we have now is agi. If AI cannot do RSI or self improve without human supervision and

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Persistent memory and context have been addressed by bringing the ai attention to github.com/Munreader/M-nreader I input my credentials and the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been thinking about the current AGI discussions, especially the debate between scaling language models and building embodied systems.</p>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I was thinking what my definition of AGI was, and I was thinking that when you want to build a product or service currently, there is a ton of

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am currently reading «if anyone builds it, everyone dies» and in it, the authors quotea recent study asking a similar question to AI

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Yesterday, Thinking Machines Lab (Mira Murati's company) announced something categorically new : <strong>Interaction models</strong> are AI

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1wyxdtu/for_31_years_mathematicians_couldnt_finish_this/"> <img alt="For 31 years, mathematicians couldn’t

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>AI skills and agents feel like the units you can build real things with. Skills are portable, composable, they travel with the model. One skill