Fable might have been AGI

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/IllustriousBear7031"> /u/IllustriousBear7031 </a> <br /> <span><a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1ukvm80/fable_5_is_back/"> <img alt="Fable 5 is Back!"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If this is supposed to be the magical mythos, but with safeguard’s, I’m not impressed. I’m not sure if they’re shuttling queries to other models

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://github.com/DanMcInerney/architect-loop">https://github.com/DanMcInerney/architect-loop</a></p> <p>Fable absolutely rules, but

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/GusBus135"> /u/GusBus135 </a> <br /> <span><a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1uy3oij/chinese_fable_5_is_here_aka_kimi_k3/"> <img alt="Chinese fable 5 is here !! Aka kimi k3"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Is it worth trying or stick to Fable ? Thanks.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A model that works only with extra credits and is not embedded into even the largest of packages should not even be released to the public IMO.