A Signed AI Agent Receipt Can Still Be Wrong

<p>Four agents entered an infinite loop in November 2025. They ran for 11 days. The bill was $47,000. Nobody noticed until it was over.</p> <p>The team was running a market

<p><em>A sub-agent's success report is generator output, not ground truth. Verify the work yourself, and reward the agent that refuses a false premise.</em></p> <p>In one session

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have built a programmable governance layer for AI agents. I am considering to open source completely. Looking for feedback.</p> <p>Agent demos

<h2> The scenario </h2> <p>Your AI agent just deleted a customer record. Three months later, an auditor asks you to prove:</p> <ul> <li> <strong>What tool actually ran</strong>

<p>A product page is not a contract.</p> <p>It is a presentation surface.</p> <p>That distinction matters more once AI agents start interacting with commerce systems.</p>

arXiv:2609.01992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent evaluations face two distinct evidentiary questions: whether a reported claim is recomputable from retained evidence

<p>One of our rounds posted its receipt — the commit message and pull-request body that say what the round did, with the readings it took. <strong>Every figure in it was

<p>The AI agent economy is about to get very real. When Claude needs to call an API, when a trading bot wants to execute a swap, or when an autonomous researcher needs to purchase