NeurIPS desk-rejected 178 papers for being "AI-generated". The detector flagged

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>TMLR desk rejected two years of work/efforts. What could be the possible reason? No reason was given in the desk rejection. The work is related

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I got my batch of four papers for AAAI 2027. All four papers make empirical claims, none include code, data, or anything I can actually check.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm really confused about what the point of the prompt injection was (speaking as an author). Is it just a study? I would really prefer that they

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>From Thomas G. Dietterich (arXiv moderator for cs.LG) on 𝕏 (thread):<br /> <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A couple of weeks ago I <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sl5k6d/we_benchmarked_translategemma12b_against_5/">shared the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Google deployed an agentic AI peer-reviewer at two top CS conferences — reviewing ~10,000 papers with 30-minute turnaround — and the new formal

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The annual Machine Learning Reproducibility Challenge (MLRC) 2026 is now open for submissions. This year, it is held as an official track at