Prompt Injection in NeurIPS 2026? [D]

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Does anyone experience a similar story that some reviewers reporting ethical issue due to NeurIPS-side prompt injection for catching

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Today officially marks the end of the author-reviewer discussion period. The acknowledgement deadline has already passed by over 3 days and our

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Out of curiosity, if you were a reviewer or author, how did the review period go?</p> <p>For me, it was weird, because I gave reviews with

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1sw0vcf/stanford_researchers_fed_a_language_model_a_dna/"> <img alt="Stanford researchers fed a language model a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>hey all. the NeurIPS Position Paper Track just used a proprietary AI detector (Pangram) to desk-reject 18.4% of all submissions. no human review,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the