NeurIPS AI Assisted Review authors/reviewers? [D]

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>UAI review results were released last Thursday, and the discussion period was clearly stated as April 23 to May 2nd.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Has anyone here used Stanford Paper Review before submitting a paper?</p> <p>I just tried it on mine and it gave some useful feedback, but I’m

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello,</p> <p>I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms.</p> <p>Any insight is welcome, thank

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Quick question for those currently reviewing papers for ICLR: Are you using AI tools to assist with your reviews, or are you still doing

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The reviews were just released, and I downloaded my paper from OpenReview to identify areas that needed improvement. However, GPT warned me that