Stanford Paper review [D]

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Out of curiosity, if you were a reviewer or author, how did the review period go?</p> <p>For me, it was weird, because I gave reviews with

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello,</p> <p>I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms.</p> <p>Any insight is welcome, thank

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This time we have seen the worst meta reviews...may be people are unintersted to do reviews...in my case they did not acknowledge the report at

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>TMLR desk rejected two years of work/efforts. What could be the possible reason? No reason was given in the desk rejection. The work is related

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know AI use must be disclosed, and I'm fine with it. However, I'm being careful on not using LLMs to actually check my review (more than