ICLR reviewers, are you using AI to review papers or still doing it the old-scho

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Out of curiosity, if you were a reviewer or author, how did the review period go?</p> <p>For me, it was weird, because I gave reviews with

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Today officially marks the end of the author-reviewer discussion period. The acknowledgement deadline has already passed by over 3 days and our

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Has anyone here used Stanford Paper Review before submitting a paper?</p> <p>I just tried it on mine and it gave some useful feedback, but I’m

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know AI use must be disclosed, and I'm fine with it. However, I'm being careful on not using LLMs to actually check my review (more than

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Google deployed an agentic AI peer-reviewer at two top CS conferences — reviewing ~10,000 papers with 30-minute turnaround — and the new formal

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A couple of weeks ago I <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sl5k6d/we_benchmarked_translategemma12b_against_5/">shared the