Are there any comparisons between Qwen3.5 4B vs Qwen3-VL 4B for vision tasks (ca

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1s7rcwr/qwen35_omni_qwens_latest_generation_of_fully/"> <img alt="Qwen3.5 Omni - Qwen’s latest generation

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sn3izh/qwen3635ba3b_released/"> <img alt="Qwen3.6-35B-A3B released!"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So in response to the Great Token Reconning of 2026, I decided to try out Qwen 3.6 as a daily driver, and although it's only been about a day, I

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>With practically all of LocalLlama glazing Qwen 3.5/3.6 for it's coding skills. Along with the fact that Alibaba themselves are focusing on

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm genuinely unsure if I'm doing something wrong, or if the model is just worse, despite the community enthusiasm. I tend to use it with pi

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><blockquote> <p>Wait, I need to be careful about the &quot;no_think&quot; tag in the system prompt. The system prompt says <code>/no_think</code>.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I could not find good data points on what speed one could get with a single 5090 and enough DDR4 RAM. </p> <p>My system: AMD EPYC 7532 32core

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Long time Claude Opus user, but after the recent session limit changes by Anthropic, I am seriously considering trying Chinese models for coding.