<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been noticing something while building.</p> <p>If I test a prompt alone, it works well.</p> <p>Even chaining 2–3 steps feels okay.</p>
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Been building with LLM workflows recently.</p> <p>Single prompts → work well </p> <p>Even 2–3 steps → manageable </p> <p>But once the workflow
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>One recurring issue with domain-specific agents is that overly defensive refusal behavior can make them much less useful once the workflow gets
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>For people building multi-step AI workflows:</p> <p>Are you repeatedly sending the same context between steps?</p> <p>Example:</p> <p>summarize →
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>One thing that got weird for us pretty fast was “pause/resume”.</p> <p>At first it sounded simple enough.<br /> Workflow is doing multiple steps,
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I apologize if this is low-effort, but I’m curious about where and how people are successfully combining frontier and local models to accomplish
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →