Why hasn't AI text generation massively disrupted books yet, when it's technical

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Every &quot;AI agent&quot; that controls a computer today does this: generate text → parse it → execute → serialize result back to text → repeat.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://originality.ai/blog/likely-ai-success-self-help-book-study">&quot;Ironically, one of the 844 books in this dataset is called

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Ai for non technical person that can ingest 1000 - 2000 pages college textbooks like mathematics, physics, chemistry, social books and give

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sh3c7g/claude_mythos_preview_is_everyones_problem/"> <img alt="Claude Mythos Preview Is Everyone’s

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I saw that Dreamina just launched Seedance 2.0 recently and I spent a few days testing it. Since I handle a lot of video content for my team, I

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've noticed something about Claude from talking to it. It's very very distinct in its talking style, much more of an individual than some other

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone,</p> <p>I’m looking for an AI that runs entirely locally on my PC, without needing an internet connection.</p> <p>I’d like it to