The ghost in the contract or why AI does not want to be accountable

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>When it comes to legal things, AI views itself as a human being, subject to the same laws and rules.</p> <p>I've noticed this most when dealing

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been thinking about the current AGI discussions, especially the debate between scaling language models and building embodied systems.</p>

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1t6vy7j/the_80_billion_backlog_q1_2026_showed_ai_demand/"> <img alt="The $80 Billion Backlog: Q1 2026 Showed AI

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Posting because this sub is where the policy conversation should be happening and it isn't. </p> <p>I'm the COO of a mid-Atlantic insurance

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>There is a mistake people make when they think about AI.</p> <p>They imagine the problem begins when the system says something false.</p> <p>It

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>AI is neither conscious nor has it feelings</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'll be upfront about my endgame: I work at a large tech company, I have a niche picked out, and I'm making the move to build and sell AI agents

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Emotionally immersive systems create real emotional expectations in people. Abrupt inconsistency and impersonal interruption don't just frustrate