<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have tried to reproduce paper claims that are feasible for me to check. This year, out of 7 checked claims, 4 were irreproducible, with 2
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm reproducing a published paper's hybrid Gabor + CNN architecture in PyTorch. The original implementation is in TensorFlow. My reproduction
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>TMLR desk rejected two years of work/efforts. What could be the possible reason? No reason was given in the desk rejection. The work is related
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, I submitted a paper to a workshop co-located with a top conference. The paper was accepted, but reviewers are requesting additional
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I would like to file a complaint about an accepted and published CVPR 2026 paper that its main contribution is a dataset but it was never
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I got my batch of four papers for AAAI 2027. All four papers make empirical claims, none include code, data, or anything I can actually check.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone,</p> <p>I’m working on a 2-class classification problem (LCA vs. RCA coronary arteries) using 2D X-ray angiograms. I’m currently
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →