Workshop paper accepted, reviewers asked new experiments [D]

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’m a PhD student working in AI/computer vision, and I’ve hit a frustrating wall with a project.</p> <p>My supervisor asked me to improve the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So I have a bit of a weird question; suppose you were reviewing a paper. The paper is otherwise ok, but you notice that the authors left a giant

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have an ECCV paper main conf. Can I submit the same to a workshop at some other place happening before ECCV? The other workshop (non archival)

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Premise: this work is my first year PhD, and I dropped out for personal reasons. I still want to do research but independently.</p> <p>I have

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Basically the title. Due to the nonsensical situation of NeurIPS being fully sold out before the results were even released, I couldn't get

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>TMLR desk rejected two years of work/efforts. What could be the possible reason? No reason was given in the desk rejection. The work is related

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, </p> <p>let's suppose I am working on an algorithm that uses principles x to solve problems A and B. I already implemented a very basic

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A paper from our group was accepted to an ICCV25 workshop. Copyright transfer was completed, registration was completed, and the paper was