[D] Accepted ICCV25 workshop paper somehow never made it into proceedings
The story surfaced on March 22nd in a Reddit discussion where someone reported that their accepted ICCV 2025 workshop paper — a submission that had gone through review, received acceptance, and presumably been prepared for publication — simply never appeared in the proceedings. Not delayed, not flagged, not explained. Just absent. The post has the particular exhausted quality of someone who has already spent time checking and rechecking before going public. Whether the issue sits with the workshop organizers, the proceedings pipeline, or some administrative gap in between remains unclear from the single available signal. ICCV 2025 is one of the flagship computer vision conferences, and its workshops carry real professional weight for the researchers who publish there — especially early-career academics for whom a proceedings entry is a tangible credential, not a formality.
If confirmed, here is what this means. A paper that exists in acceptance but not in record occupies a genuinely awkward professional space — it cannot be properly cited, indexed, or verified by a hiring committee or grant panel. The researcher in question may be carrying a credential that exists in email and nowhere else. More broadly, if this reflects a systemic gap in how workshop proceedings are compiled and verified, it raises questions about the accountability structures around top-tier conference workshops, which often run with lean organizational teams under significant time pressure. The conference itself carries reputational risk if accepted work routinely falls through administrative cracks.
Watch for a response from ICCV 2025 workshop organizers or the broader ICCV organizing committee acknowledging the issue — and whether similar cases emerge from other researchers once this one is visible.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper was recently accepted to a workshop at CVPR-2026 as non-archival acceptance. Is it mandatory for me to register to the conference as I
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello,</p> <p>Our paper was accepted to EMNLP and we were given poster slot. However due to Visa issue, we cannot attend in-person anymore. We
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I would like to file a complaint about an accepted and published CVPR 2026 paper that its main contribution is a dataset but it was never
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I was trying to submit to ICML FM4LS workshop but noticed that <a
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have an ECCV paper main conf. Can I submit the same to a workshop at some other place happening before ECCV? The other workshop (non archival)
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, I submitted a paper to a workshop co-located with a top conference. The paper was accepted, but reviewers are requesting additional
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>TMLR desk rejected two years of work/efforts. What could be the possible reason? No reason was given in the desk rejection. The work is related
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →