Anyone still use turboquant?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello,</p> <p>Anyone knows what are the differences and if they are really doing the job they say? Because i was watching something about

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Reading on the TurboQuant news makes me extremely excited for the future of local llm.</p> <p>When should we be expecting it?</p> <p>What are

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>wouldnt that have a drastic improvement??</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/nothi69">

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Seems like Google didn't give credit where it's due for TurboQuant.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>All repositories either have compiling bugs in Windows or there's zero instructions to compiling at all.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://x.com/i/status/2036533564158910740">https://x.com/i/status/2036533564158910740</a></p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Does turboquant need any actual arch changes to a model or is it just a different method of representing kv cache and can all be done in

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I seen this one mentioned but it was a source from about 14 months ago.</p> <p>In the age of the Qwen 3.6 and Gemma 4- is there still a use for