When should we expect TurboQuant?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello,</p> <p>Anyone knows what are the differences and if they are really doing the job they say? Because i was watching something about

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I haven’t used it in a while, is it still worth it?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>wouldnt that have a drastic improvement??</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/nothi69">

<p>Building a production-ready, fault-tolerant Retrieval-Augmented Generation system is an exercise in managing harsh tradeoffs. You want massive context, lightning-fast hybrid

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Does turboquant need any actual arch changes to a model or is it just a different method of representing kv cache and can all be done in

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://x.com/i/status/2036533564158910740">https://x.com/i/status/2036533564158910740</a></p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just read the google recent blog post they're claiming 6x KV cache compression with zero accuracy loss and up to 8x attention speedup on H100s.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>All repositories either have compiling bugs in Windows or there's zero instructions to compiling at all.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted