From Bug Found to Bug Filed: A Bug-Reporter Skill for Claude Code

<h2> Your Code Reviews Are a Bottleneck </h2> <p>Every engineering team has the same problem: PRs sit in review queues for hours (or days). Senior engineers spend 30% of their

<p>The more I use AI tools like Claude Code, the clearer it becomes: engineering skills are what make AI output worth shipping.</p> <p>AI makes writing code faster. But shipping

<ul> <li><p>Skills enable Claude to retain expertise across sessions via slash commands, eliminating repetitive explanations of workflows and preferences.</p></li> <li><p>A skill

<p>Your agent passed all the tests. It's been running in production for three weeks. And it has been quietly wrong the entire time.</p> <p>This is not a hypothetical. Galileo's

<p>I read the phrase "spec-driven development" and immediately decided it was for people without taste. Six months later, Claude Code generated a discount system that applied

<p>Last month, our team's bug escape rate dropped from 23% to <strong>under 3%</strong>. We didn't hire more QA engineers. We didn't write more tests. We started using Claude as a

<p>Anthropic shipped Opus 4.7 on April 16, 2026. Same $5/$25 pricing as 4.6. Same 1M context. Same 128K output ceiling. Different model entirely when you put it in an agentic

<ul> <li>GitHub repository: <a href="https://github.com/gezilinll/agent-grove" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/gezilinll/agent-grove</a> </li> <li>Online