<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We are currently facing an ICML 2026 reviewer who lowered the score to a 1 (Confidence 5) while ignoring our rebuttal and relying on fake
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey Reddit,</p> <p>I’m a researcher in a niche theoretical CS/ML area. Recently I’ve been dealing with repeated emails from an “independent
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As the title suggests, I received a weak rejection with high confidence from a reviewer who is clearly LLM written, while all 4 other reviewers
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Bascially title. </p> <p>A reviewer found the arxiv of our paper, which is an older version, before we changed the title and name of the method
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →