<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Recently got the reviews back from ijcai, now all is good except for this one reviewer who has not read the paper in depth, and is making false
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As the title suggests, I received a weak rejection with high confidence from a reviewer who is clearly LLM written, while all 4 other reviewers
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just thought I'd highlight this issue to the ML community, since I recently had this problem arise and it might be useful for some.</p> <p>I had
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1w9v43o/update_eic_confirmed_ghost_reviewerhow_to_get/"> <img alt="[UPDATE - EIC confirmed ghost
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →