[UPDATE - EIC confirmed ghost reviewer]How to get rejected by IEEE T-PAMI with '

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper cited and even built up on a niche topic that was accepted in 2024. The template and everything was also followed properly. Sure, it

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We are currently facing an ICML 2026 reviewer who lowered the score to a 1 (Confidence 5) while ignoring our rebuttal and relying on fake

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>hey all. the NeurIPS Position Paper Track just used a proprietary AI detector (Pangram) to desk-reject 18.4% of all submissions. no human review,