Why OpenAi models are the worst with Openclaw?

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1si0nmr/gpt54xhigh_is_worse_than_gpt52high_and_many_other/"> <img alt="GPT-5.4-x-high is worse than GPT-5.2-high

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Long time Claude Opus user, but after the recent session limit changes by Anthropic, I am seriously considering trying Chinese models for coding.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’m trying to understand why models from major labs (GPT, Claude, etc.) dominate real-world usage? You might say it's due to the expensive

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've noticed something about Claude from talking to it. It's very very distinct in its talking style, much more of an individual than some other

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've always been under the impression that open models were closely trailing behind closed source models on nearly every benchmark from LM Arena,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Ok I run a a few SaaS platforms and My GPT Mini 40 (or whatever its called) ran over and the cap was set at a certain limit.</p> <p>Well the Ai

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1t9iteh/openclaw_ia_trending_down_and_will_disappear_soon/"> <img alt="Openclaw ia trending down and will

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It used to do really well with high context and be smart, but now its making a lot of mistakes and just not able to handle the same workload it