TurboQuant is amazing and lossless, sell all your memory

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://x.com/i/status/2036533564158910740">https://x.com/i/status/2036533564158910740</a></p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by

<p>Building a production-ready, fault-tolerant Retrieval-Augmented Generation system is an exercise in managing harsh tradeoffs. You want massive context, lightning-fast hybrid

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Once china sets its goals for dominating a market it wins. Usually takes many years, but it happens. Can't compare the political will of a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just read the google recent blog post they're claiming 6x KV cache compression with zero accuracy loss and up to 8x attention speedup on H100s.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello,</p> <p>Anyone knows what are the differences and if they are really doing the job they say? Because i was watching something about

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s5cggh/google_turboquant_blew_up_for_kv_cache_heres/"> <img alt="Google TurboQuant blew up for KV cache.

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1wxma3a/micron_ceo_says_memory_supply_will_be_much/"> <img alt="Micron CEO Says Memory Supply Will Be Much