ChatGPT Often Retrieves But Rarely Cites Reddit Pages, Data Shows via @sejournal

<p><img alt="ChatGPT traffic analysis: Insights from 17 months of clickstream data"

<p>Government health, research, and regulator sites climbed ChatGPT's U.S. citation ranks while explainers fell.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>A new research paper compares how often ChatGPT and Google send people to websites, and what wider ChatGPT access did to search.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>Reddit still wins ChatGPT citations where a forum is the best source. Two captures, four days apart, show what actually decides the credit.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>Data shows ChatGPT ads becoming more common in retail conversations among US users on desktop.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>84 Reddit threads entered the retrieval pool. Zero got cited. The new tool-call format shows what ChatGPT fetches before it answers.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>A paper tested whether Google results and OpenAI's API can stand in for ChatGPT's citations. They matched cited sites more often than the exact pages.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>Google is adding subscription labels, inline links, discussion previews, and desktop link previews to its AI Search experiences.</p> <p>The post <a