Should I follow-up with the editor for a TMLR paper awaiting final decision? [D]

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I submitted a regular submission (12 pages or less) to TMLR in February that had status change to “under review” 6 weeks ago. TMLR states on

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Why is that?</p> <p>Link: <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have a paper that has been &quot;on-hold&quot; for about 2 weeks now. I understand that it might take a little longer now because of inundation

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone,</p> <p>I have a manuscript under review at <strong>Pattern Recognition (Elsevier)</strong>, and I'm a bit confused about the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>TMLR desk rejected two years of work/efforts. What could be the possible reason? No reason was given in the desk rejection. The work is related

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I recently had a paper accepted to TMLR and was wondering how prestigious it is, in comparison to A* conferences (ie. NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML), but

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I was wondering if any other reciprocal reviewers still haven't received paper assignments for ICLR 2027.</p> <p>I haven't been assigned any