<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi there, </p> <p>I have a (long) paper that's been under review at TMLR for a while (submitted in October). After the reviews came in (mostly
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I submitted a regular submission (12 pages or less) to TMLR in February that had status change to “under review” 6 weeks ago. TMLR states on
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve seen a lot of people whose reviewers went silent after initial reviews, but I am also noting abnormally quiet authors. I ultimately withdrew
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper cited and even built up on a niche topic that was accepted in 2024. The template and everything was also followed properly. Sure, it
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>ACL ARR May 2026 reviews are due on July 2. I do not see any reviewer assignement as of today. Will the review period be just 2 weeks in that
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →