Completely dead NeurIPS review period from both ends? [D]

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know there’s a lot of frustration around no response from reviewers, which I also got only one so yeah what a bummer, but I was wondering if no

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Out of curiosity, if you were a reviewer or author, how did the review period go?</p> <p>For me, it was weird, because I gave reviews with

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>ECCV reviews should be out by 2nd May. Since no exact time was specified this year, they’ll likely be released sometime within the next 48

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The date for NeurIPS 2026 author notifications is September 24th. First of all, is it normal for AC and reviewer discussion phases to be this

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, </p> <p>The author-reviewer discussion period has started, but it looks like the rebuttals are still only visible to program chairs

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>About to be over 36 hours now? Nothing on the website, twitter, anywhere. What the hell? Is anyone else facing the same issue what do I do?</p>