<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Today officially marks the end of the author-reviewer discussion period. The acknowledgement deadline has already passed by over 3 days and our
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve seen a lot of people whose reviewers went silent after initial reviews, but I am also noting abnormally quiet authors. I ultimately withdrew
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, </p> <p>The author-reviewer discussion period has started, but it looks like the rebuttals are still only visible to program chairs
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>UAI review results were released last Thursday, and the discussion period was clearly stated as April 23 to May 2nd.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper cited and even built up on a niche topic that was accepted in 2024. The template and everything was also followed properly. Sure, it
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>About to be over 36 hours now? Nothing on the website, twitter, anywhere. What the hell? Is anyone else facing the same issue what do I do?</p>
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The date for NeurIPS 2026 author notifications is September 24th. First of all, is it normal for AC and reviewer discussion phases to be this
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Out of curiosity, if you were a reviewer or author, how did the review period go?</p> <p>For me, it was weird, because I gave reviews with
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →