Seemingly impossible AI benchmark idea

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>People sometimes joke about time to solve Pokemon as a benchmark. But what about a benchmark that incorporated a wider range of different

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Working on evaluating some AI-generated outbound (SDR-style emails along with follow-ups), and I’m running into a weird problem. Everyone talks

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1urrjbv/benchmarking_coding_agents_on_databricks/"> <img alt="Benchmarking Coding Agents on Databricks’

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I spent the few days building a benchmark that maps where frontier LLMs fall on a 2D political compass (economic left/right + social

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>ARC-AGI-3 is a deeply rigged benchmark and the marketing around it is insanely misleading - Human baseline is not “human,” it’s near-elite human

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/pmz"> /u/pmz </a> <br /> <span><a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>we've been building an open source red teaming tool for AI agents. wanted to share what we keep finding because i don't think enough people are

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/ranandtoldthat"> /u/ranandtoldthat </a> <br /> <span><a