<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I want to make a position track decision thread because it is a niche and small track I think discussions will be submerged in the main track
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Results are almost here. Good luck to everyone waiting for the final decision 🙂</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The results are out today!</p> <p>Let’s share them, guys.</p> <p>Cheers!</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Creating a discussion thread for IJCAI-ECAI 2026 final decision notifications.</p> <p>The official paper notification date is April 29, 2026 AoE,
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been seeing mainly discussions about the main track. Any ACs or other reviewers here who know if the position paper track is following
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →