LLMs are a Dead End

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I keep seeing people claim that “LLMs can reason like a human” but everytime I have seen these models put to the test in real-like scenarios like

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been saying this for quite some time now and this paper that came out recently really puts it clearly</p> <p><a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1wdde0p/llms_cant_do_frontier_science_because_they_cant/"> <img alt="LLMs can't do frontier science because they

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The popular way of describing the purpose behind LLMs and the AI revolution is to imagine it as an abstraction layer. we have come from shifting

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1wddeex/llms_cant_do_frontier_science_because_they_cant/"> <img alt="LLMs can't do frontier science because

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1wbnhgt/llms_will_never_be_smarter_than_redditors/"> <img alt="&quot;LLMs will never be smarter than

Image &#x2F; Video &#x2F; Audio Gen. AI is absolutetly impressive but I fail to see how anyone can still believe that LLMs are going to replace every other white-collar job ...

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>There seems to be a lot of debate over whether LLMs alone can give us AGI. Dario Amodei seems to think LLMs are all we need whilst others like