Can AGI be achieved with LLMs alone?

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sxffva/llms_are_a_dead_end/"> <img alt="LLMs are a Dead End"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been saying this for quite some time now and this paper that came out recently really puts it clearly</p> <p><a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Some people are skeptics about ASI because &quot;LLMs can't reach ASI&quot;. Let's make this clear. </p> <p>If any AI-LLM based system can

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Several experiments and research by AI researchers say something important about where the AI field currently stands. </p> <p>First, we had

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know it’s still at least somewhat we are starting to see evidence of LLM starting to generalise all domains </p> <p>Both of these people were

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I keep seeing people claim that “LLMs can reason like a human” but everytime I have seen these models put to the test in real-like scenarios like

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So, I just read LeCun's interview with Nebius Science. I feel he had some cool points about LLMs being able to answer things, but not literally

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>You've heard this before, and now you're hearing it again. You roll your eyes. The problem with this statement is that AGI has no accepted