Hot take: LLMs have zero foresight ability. Everything else is hype.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Several experiments and research by AI researchers say something important about where the AI field currently stands. </p> <p>First, we had

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sxffva/llms_are_a_dead_end/"> <img alt="LLMs are a Dead End"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been saying this for quite some time now and this paper that came out recently really puts it clearly</p> <p><a

Image &#x2F; Video &#x2F; Audio Gen. AI is absolutetly impressive but I fail to see how anyone can still believe that LLMs are going to replace every other white-collar job ...

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The models keep getting better.</p> <p>But it feels like the harder question now is no longer<br /> “what can this model do?”<br /> it’s<br />

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1ts1bcc/hot_take_llms_cant_do_statistics_not_really/"> <img alt="Hot take: LLMs can’t do statistics. Not

<p><strong>271 zero-day vulnerabilities. One AI model. One Firefox release.</strong> And that's just one of four stories worth your attention this fortnight.</p> <p>If you run

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>There seems to be a lot of debate over whether LLMs alone can give us AGI. Dario Amodei seems to think LLMs are all we need whilst others like