Any neuroscience people on the sub with an interest in AI have thoughts on where

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been thinking about the current AGI discussions, especially the debate between scaling language models and building embodied systems.</p>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have always thought it's absolutely absurd to anthropomorphise LLMs until very recently. It didn't make any sense to me. I saw the system from

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>it feels like ai adoption is exploding but actual ai literacy still feels weirdly low.</p> <p>a lot of people use chatgpt, but most people still

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Recently, I’ve become fascinated by Continual Learning, especially the idea of AI systems that can continuously adapt and improve from experience

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Is this still an open ended question or are researchers pretty confident one way or the other </p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32;

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey everyone, I'm Gary McCoy, co-founder of WEIR AI.</p> <p>Before this, I spent years at Meta, Microsoft, and Snowflake working on the AI and

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1wvlp81/openai_security_controlling_models_is_now_hell/"> <img alt="OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm seeing some people desperately claiming what we have now is agi. If AI cannot do RSI or self improve without human supervision and