<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been seeing mainly discussions about the main track. Any ACs or other reviewers here who know if the position paper track is following
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My UAI paper got </p> <p>Pre rebuttal:</p> <p>Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4, 4/3, 3/3</p> <p>After rebuttal:</p> <p>Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4,
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have an average of 3.5. One of the reviewer gave us a 2 by bringing up a new issue he hadn't mentioned in his initial review, taking that from
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Any one got meta score 2.5 (borderline finding) and still accepted to findings previously?? In my case meta review didnot acknowledge the
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →